The concept of infinity is useful in mathematics, but doesn’t have many practical applications in everyday life. In fact, it tends to cause problems. For example, if you had an infinite number of ping pong balls, each with a different numeral, and you gave away all of the even-numbered balls, you’d still have an infinite number of ping pong balls. If you had an infinite number of amoebas and each one split in two, you’d still have an infinite number of amoebas. (And this is ignoring the fact that you can’t have an infinite number of things: where would you put them?)
Now picture the number line and that gap between Zero and One. How many numbers are there in the gap? Another endless string, rational and irrational numbers. For every two values, there’s always another value in the space between them. In order to move from Zero to One, then, we have to pass through an infinite number of numbers. This idea is the premise for many theoretical puzzles — paradoxes — all based on the idea that you can never take an infinite number of steps. But in reality, every gap contains its own infinity, and we traverse those gaps routinely, whenever we scratch our nose or walk across the street to visit a lonely neighbor.
Which brings us, at long last, to my intended topic: The change that can occur when you move from complete absence to a single presence. From having Zero to having One.
Sometimes I try to comprehend what it would be like to be the only survivor of a nuclear war. Assuming I had enough food, water, and breathable air, and could find some decent shelter, the next greatest challenge would be loneliness. Like prisoners who are put into solitary confinement for long periods of time, I imagine that being alone would eventually drive me insane. Wandering from place to place in search of other survivors, I would gradually lose hope as it became apparent that either no one else is alive or the others are so far away that I’ll never be able to reach them. But what if I did find another person? Just one. What difference would it make? Zero people, or one person. The difference, you already know, would be enormous. In fact, the difference would be immeasurable. Infinite.
Back to solitary confinement. For some reason, you’ve been sent to prison. Worse, you’re thrown into a small cell in the basement, out of hearing range of anyone else. Your food is sent to you on a conveyor belt. A single light bulb burns for three hours a day. Your cell consists of a cot, pillow, blanket, toilet, and sink. There are no sounds. Nothing moves, except you. There is no mirror, no window to the outside. How long would you last before you lost your mind? Now add one item. A book. Would it matter whether it was a novel or a biography? Even a chemistry textbook would be infinitely better than no book at all. That single volume could keep your mind from shattering. You would read every word, slowly, repeatedly. The book would become your whole world.
We have a coat closet in our house that’s filled with all kinds of outerwear. Adding or removing one item would probably go unnoticed. But what if I were outside in the middle of winter and I had no coat? The wind is howling and the temperature is zero. Would an increase of one degree matter at all? No. But one coat would make a big difference.
There are people who own ten homes. There are other people who have nowhere to live. To whom would the addition of one house make the greatest impact? How much would you appreciate the eleventh home? How much would you appreciate the first? You’re crossing the desert. You have one gallon of cold water, or you have no gallons of cold water. Tremendous difference. Life and death.
Do you have friends? People who really know you, I mean, or at least try to know you. If you had a hundred casual friends and acquaintances, would you trade them all for one person who paid close attention, asked questions, and actually listened to the answers and remembered them? What kind of difference does it make to have one person know you, rather than none?
I wrote a post recently in which I said I’ve let go of my delusions about changing the world. But I know better. I can change the world for someone. I can find someone who has Zero and help them to have One. That could change the person’s entire life. And the difference for me would be just as great, because changing the world for someone would be infinitely greater than changing the world for no one.
Betty Londergan
August 15, 2010
What a lovely, thoughtful and compelling post! Thanks for the thought-provoking dialogue…
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 15, 2010
Thank you, Betty. The last paragraph was inspired by your What Gives 365 project.
LikeLike
shoreacres
August 15, 2010
The giggle, first: …you can’t have an infinite number of things: where would you put them? Obviously, I’d put them in my infinitely spacious closet!
To your larger point – it’s proven daily in the lives of the elderly. I’ve watched my mother’s response as, one by one, relatives and friends have been claimed by death or Alzheimer’s. Now, at 92, there is one aging sister and one daughter that she really can count on. Her ever-present anxiety is expressed in the question, “Who will take care of me if something happens to you?” Translation: “What if there is no “one” left?”
When I read your prison analogy and your description of solitary confinement, I thought immediately of nursing homes and hospitals. I worked in them for years and I can tell you – without an advocate, without some “one” to stand up to the system, they can be terrifying places. There was a good bit of foolishness written about “death panels” during the health care debate, but the elderly and their caregivers know the truth – for far too many people in the health care bureacracy, the difference between one fragile human life and the extinguishing of that same life is not infinite, but infinitesimal.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 15, 2010
You can also take the idea of an advocate right back to the prison analogy: How many innocent people have won their freedom because of one person’s persistent pursuit of justice? And how many more languish in a cell because there is no one?
LikeLike
Amiable Amiable
August 15, 2010
So thought-provoking, as usual. I am trying to figure out if I could trade in all of my friends and acquaintances for one attentive, caring, dedicated person. My fear is that after living with me for a short while, they’d take off like a shot. Then there would be none. I think I’d be content to stick with a bunch of self-centered and self-absorbed people. Spoken like a true Big Happy Nothing.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 15, 2010
Well, I won’t take off like a shot. Remember, blud is thicker than water.
LikeLike
Amiable Amiable
August 16, 2010
Thanks, Blud Brother!
LikeLike
Marie M
August 16, 2010
Wonderful essay. Thank you, especially for the hopefulness I detect in your conclusion.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 16, 2010
Thanks, Marie. I guess the question is, can I make that step from doing nothing to doing something, passing through the infinite number of tiny excuses in between?
LikeLike
cooperstownersincanada
August 16, 2010
Nice work. I was moved by your concluding thoughts. As always, well-written and compelling.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 17, 2010
I appreciate the kind words, Kevin.
LikeLike
C
August 20, 2010
Just in case you didn’t realize, you are “one” who has made a difference in “one” particular life. Thank you for that!
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 22, 2010
And so are you. In fact, I’m sure you’ve been the difference in many lives.
LikeLike
Mitch
August 21, 2010
Okay, you’re starting to scare me now. lol First, I’d be fine if I were the last or only person on earth; then again, I’m an only child, so I’m kind of used to it. But if I couldn’t find a book to read or access a computer where I could at least play a game here and there,… might be tough. The cell thing; that’s really scary, because of the claustrophobia, and that’s what keeps me from killing someone. The one about the house… actually, that’s an interesting topic because from “our” perspective it means more to the person without, but to the person “with” it means a lot as well; people are just like that.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 22, 2010
I’m not so sure you’d be fine, Mitch. I just had a flash of Tom Hanks in “Cast Away,” talking to the volleyball. You’d probably draw a face on your computer screen and name it “Dell” or something. I think you’re more connected to people than you’re admitting.
That’s probably a good thing about the claustrophobia.
LikeLike
Mitch
August 23, 2010
Well, I’m not saying that I wouldn’t totally miss it. But before I was married I’d go weeks without talking to anyone, or caring whether they were in my world or not. You see, it would depend on what else was either there or not. If I couldn’t listen or play music anymore, if I couldn’t read any books and just had to walk around and kill my food or plant food and wait for it to grow yeah I’d probably go nuts. But if I had something to help keep my mind stimulated, I really do believe I’d be just fine.
LikeLike