Electronic book readers are dropping from the sky like an invasion from Mars. At least that’s how it appears to me. I’m the only person on the planet who still doesn’t have a cell phone, I’ve never sent or received a text message, and I wouldn’t know a BlackBerry from a Baby Ruth. Yet when Amazon’s Kindle arrived in 2007, I felt as though someone had invented time travel, or at least the electronic equivalent of pizza.
I wanted one.
There had been other ebook readers on the market before Kindle, and I was aware of them in a fuzzy, out-of-the-loop kind of way. I was intrigued, but did nothing to pursue the possibilities. Several factors caused my hesitation, including price. Paying hundreds of dollars for the ability to buy ebooks raised immediate questions. The ebooks were less expensive than printed books, but would I buy enough of them to make up for the cost of the device? I had no doubt that I would. But I also knew that a second version of the Kindle would show up sooner or later. And a third, and a fourth. I reminded myself that I had long been caught in the computer-software-browser trap, which forced me to spend thousands of dollars every few years just so I could keep doing what I had been doing with my now obsolete equipment. Could the same thing happen with ebook readers? Would I be able to transfer already purchased books from the unit to its successor, or would I have to purchase them again and again? If I lost my reader — like if I were skydiving in Bolivia and it fell out of my pocket, or if I just dropped it down a storm drain — would all of my books be lost, too?
The arguments for getting a reader were solid. You could buy and download ebooks in seconds, and store thousands of them on the device. But the suggestion that we would suddenly have more room in our house because we no longer needed bookshelves was ridiculous. Our family has hundreds of books, and we’re not going to get rid of them just because we’re now capable of replacing them with an electronic version.
What about this idea that we’d no longer have to kill trees to make paper for publishing? More trees would mean more oxygen, and cleaner air. Technological progress and back to nature! But is it true? Thirty years ago, few people had printers in their homes. Today, we have two laser printers, a copier, and a fax machine, all churning out reams of paper every year. Once a week we open our front door and find yet another bundle of printed store flyers that we will probably not look at. Between 1988 and 2008, the number of magazines published in the United States increased dramatically. True, newspaper circulation is dropping in the US, but worldwide, it is not.
It seems that, at least for the foreseeable future, we will continue our use of dead trees. And this is another example of where we fail at predicting trends. We tend to see options as either-or, as though we’re going to choose one thing and completely reject the other. I don’t know what the typical reaction was to the first printed books, but I bet there was a good deal of despair and hand-wringing. Mass production of books? It will cheapen the medium. Quality will decline in favor of quantity. We’ll lose the art of publishing. Was that the result? To some extent I guess the book as a unique work of art was lost, but the net effect can only be described as positive. When motion pictures first appeared, many people predicted the end of live theater. That didn’t happen. When television arrived, followed by the VCR, the death of film was forecast. Wrong again.
Can an ebook reader ever replace the experience of holding a bound volume, turning its pages, feeling the texture of the paper and the sheer weight of the thing? No, but not everyone values that sensory aspect of reading. Some people will use reading devices exclusively. Others will cling to their paper books, refusing to even consider the use of the little plastic boxes. Most of us will incorporate both into our lives, continuing to buy and read traditional books while jiggling things around to make room for the newcomer.
I will get an ebook reader — Kindle or something else — sooner or later. But I will also keep buying printed books. It won’t be one or the other. My choices will depend on circumstances. The electronic device will mean convenience, portability, instant gratification, speed. But our home will always be filled with books. Clunky and colorful, those books, and endlessly patient: they sit on shelves, unopened and unnoticed, sometimes waiting years for the chance to perform. But they’re always ready. No batteries to charge, no wireless network to access. I don’t see them as dead trees; I see them as minds alive with ideas, images, stories, and knowledge. The medium still works, and will always work, no upgrade required.
Paper or plastic? Yes, please.
jharris
August 24, 2010
i don’t have a cellphone and i’ve never texted and i’ve only a vague idea of the difference between a blackberry and a blueberry — and i love pizza — but i don’t want an ebook reader. i would feel like a traitor.
as i watch the newspaper industry struggle with redefining itself in this digital age, the credibility of the written word going down because of the over-proliferation of text, i want to gather up all my dear old paper books and make a cave out of them to shield me from the onslaught of easy and lazy and disposable language. there’s something about the relative permanence of actual books that i find comforting.
so i will boycott and bad mouth the new technology until someone buys me a Kindle for Christmas.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 24, 2010
I was thinking of your post about your trip to the bookstore and the conversation you had with the salesperson who wanted you to try out the store’s ebook reader. There seems to be a gap between people who love books and those who love technology. Maybe it’ll take another generation to close it up, but I’m sure it will happen. Thank you for your comment. I hope the “over-proliferation of text” won’t keep you from writing.
LikeLike
cooperstownersincanada
August 24, 2010
Another interesting article. I just recently got a cellphone, but have not learned anything about “texting”. I will continue to buy books. Going to a book store is one of the true pleasures of life, in my humble opinion. I imagine though that one day I will buy myself some sort of e-Book reader. Thanks for sharing your thoughts on this. Insightful as always.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 24, 2010
It really seemed as though everyone in the world was texting, except me. I guess I was wrong about that. And you just got a cell phone? I won’t be joining you anytime soon, but I agree about the bookstore — wonderful, dangerous places.
Thanks, Kevin.
LikeLike
shoreacres
August 24, 2010
No, everyone in the world isn’t texting. I’ve never texted in my life. I tried once, and it didn’t work. Then I found out you had to subscribe to a service and pay for the privilege. That didn’t seem too good.
I do have a cell phone, which is (gasp!) a phone. I use it to make phone calls. What a concept. I love it dearly, though, because in the days before cell phones, I was isolated out on my docks. I constantly was having to stop and make phone calls from pay phones. There was no way to call, for example, a doctor’s office and get a call-back. And now, it’s my mom’s lifeline – I can leave here alone knowing she can get in touch with me whenever she needs to.
But Kindles? Nooks? Ireaders? Not a chance. I’m sure they can be useful, but I’ve had it with our society’s tendency to invert the old saying on its head. It used to be that Necessity was the mother of Invention. Now, someone invents something, and then the marketing department goes to work convincing us it’s a necessity. 🙂
Besides – I’m a note taker, and every time I read a book I use a different color of ink, with the date written in that color. I can go back to a book I’ve read five times, and find five sets of differently-colored comments. It becomes a history of my own thought.
I’m truly weird, you know?
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 25, 2010
Your use of a cell phone seems sensible to me. Our kids all insisted they had to have one in case there was an emergency and they needed to get in touch with us. (A transparent ploy, yet still hard to argue with.) When they’re with us, they’re on their cell phones constantly, either talking or texting or checking something. But when they’re not here and we try to call them on their cell phones, they never answer.
I also agree with you about invention and marketing. Shouldn’t we all have rock-hard abs and perfectly diced vegetables by now?
Wonderfully weird, I would say.
LikeLike
Amiable Amiable
August 25, 2010
Thank you for explaining this thing called a Kindle. If you ever change your mind about a cell phone, I’ll explain to you how to use it. Seems like you won’t be getting one, though, and I commend you! I feel like a doctor on call 24/7 with mine. Anyway, I probably won’t be getting a Kindle because I can’t find the time to even read a “real” book. However, because of another thought-provoking post, you’ve inspired me to make an attempt by re-reading one covered with dust on my nightstand – A House in Sicily, of course. (I would have put the title in italics but I don’t know how to use those HTML tags like shoreacres! I’m impressed and intrigued by that “technology.”)
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 25, 2010
The thing that’s really holding me back is the fact that if I get a cell phone, I won’t be able to complain anymore about “these people and their cell phones” — especially the ones who are ordering Chinese food while they’re online at the bank. (“I SAID NO BROCCOLI!”)
I’ve never heard of “A House in Sicily.” Is it a memoir? I have “A Stone Boudoir,” which is also about Sicily. Have you read that one?
LikeLike
Amiable Amiable
August 25, 2010
I’m pretty sure you especially would not be a fan of people talking on their cell phones at the movies. Wait, did you write a post about that?
I think you might enjoy reading the memoir (yes), “A House in Sicily,” as a light read. (I haven’t yet tried your instructions on italics – thanks for not getting all techy on me like the Times DIY books.) It’s about a British woman who inherits a house in Taormina and turns it into an inn. Guests included the likes of William Faulkner, Tennessee Williams, and Roald Dahl to name a few.
LikeLike
Amiable Amiable
August 25, 2010
I forgot to thank you for mentioning “A Stone Boudoir.” Haven’t read it – but I’ll look into it.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 26, 2010
I didn’t write a post about cell phones at the movies, but I’m sure someone has. How about people who talk to each other during the movie? I was at a Broadway show once and the person on stage turned to the audience and told someone to be quiet. It was my favorite part of the show.
That book sounds like something I’d enjoy. Although it makes me wonder why we never inherit houses in Taormina. Or anywhere else.
LikeLike
Val Erde
August 25, 2010
The kindle and its kind kind of make me think of a word processor I had which had a liquid crystal display and it was supposed to be easy to read the typeface on it. Hmm… not so. Then compare that with a ‘proper’ computer with a backlit screen and the sort of programs we have now. Am I interested in the neanderthal device for reading books? Nope. Like you, I like the feel and the weight and the pleasure of reading real books. Also, apropos Kindle… I’m not sure that it can show anything other than text and maybe diagrams, do you know? Probably wouldn’t be any good for, say, art books…
As for the cell phone. I have one. It’s dead. I haven’t bothered to revive it.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 25, 2010
My understanding of the Kindle is that, so far, it’s best for text. I have a math book filled with symbols and diagrams all over the page, and when I tried to convert it to publish on the Kindle, it was a mess. They may have made some progress over the past year or so, but I’m not sure. I originally thought Kindle would be great for travel, replacing all those heavy, photo-laden books, but the travel guides we like are not available in that format. Art books would fall into the same category, I’d imagine.
I’ve been surprised by the number of people who say they don’t have or don’t use a cell phone.
It was good to hear from you again. I’ll visit your blog very soon.
LikeLike
Betty Londergan
August 26, 2010
I don’t feel passionately one way or the other about the e-readers, but I do get worked up about what’s being written about them. LOVED your post, btw, because it’s thoughtful and to the point — but when I read in the NY Times this Sunday that e-readers make bookworms not seem so “bookish” and entice people to want to talk to you, touch it, and engage with you, I just burst out laughing. Talk about a complete misunderstanding of a reader! When I’m reading, the LAST thing I want is for somebody to interrupt me and try to “engage” with me. I don’t want to seem approachable — I want to read! It’s this kind of chasm that continues to blur the issue, I think. Technology has made us supremely approachable and open to engagement at every hour of the day, night, and pretty much every place on the planet. Reading is and has always been a glorious escape from that — I wouldn’t give that up for anything!
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 26, 2010
Touch it? Touch my two hundred dollar book reading device, the one with the little plastic buttons and the flimsy screen? Does it come with an optional dog zapper attachment?
You’re right: technology has given us the ability to NEVER be alone. My son is constantly texting with his friends. What are they talking about? Or is that not the point? Maybe it’s that people are growing up in mortal fear of being out of touch for ten seconds because they might have to spend some time by themselves, doing weird things like thinking. We seem to be filling our time with communication and entertainment.
I’m with you, Betty. I’ll meet you at the library in Chappaquiddick. Oh, wait, I forgot — people even talk out loud in libraries now. And they’d probably try to touch our books, too.
LikeLike
jharris
August 26, 2010
betty – i have to confess to being one of the infringers of whom you speak. i saw some people at our neighborhood pool earlier this summer, sprawled out on the concrete with their sleek little e-readers, and i couldn’t help it. i stopped. i stared. i cast a shadow over their sleek little electronic screens and they looked up, resigned. i said, ‘are those as cool as they’re supposed to be?’ they said, ‘sure.’ i said, ‘can you read in the bright sunlight?’ they said, ‘yes.’ i said, ‘am i bothering you?’ (i did not actually say that, because it was very clear that i was, in fact, annoying the hell out of them).
but they are so interesting, so modern, so… odd. i wanted to touch the screens, ask if they were fun to read, ask what books they were reading, ask if they felt they weren’t REALLY reading since they’re not reading real books. but the people at the pool did not want to talk to me and so i wandered away, to my little spot in the grass where i had a library book that had already gotten wet and tainted with SPF 80 sunscreen.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 26, 2010
That could have been its own post, I’m sure you know. Any chance?
LikeLike
Trey - Swollen Thumb Entertainment
August 26, 2010
Totally awesome article! I just shared it on Twitter and Facebook.
People have always been afraid of new things. The truth is that new technology will never harm the usage of old technology as long as the old technology has a place in society. It’s called progress! If the old technology goes away, then it was meant to happen. That’s why books are rarely scribed by hand anymore, because there’s no need for it with printing presses.
The same goes for TV and Theater. Theater has it’s place in society, because it’s not the same as TV. Seeing and hearing people sing in person is not the same as watching electronic images and hearing electronic sounds.
And the same goes for books. Electronic does not necessarily mean better. I predict that in the future, paper books may become less abundant, but I highly doubt that they’re going to go away anytime soon.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 30, 2010
You’re right: If something disappears, it was probably meant to. But in most cases, there are individuals who keep the flame burning (historical reenactments, vintage baseball, various arts and crafts, etc.) There also seems to be an ebb and flow to change. I’ve noticed lately that turntables seem to be more common in stores — are people playing vinyl records again? Books will be around at least for the rest of our lives. And if they do eventually disappear, the people alive then won’t share our emotional attachment. In fact, they may be saddened by the replacement of ebook readers by the next technology.
Thanks for the kind words and the thoughtful comment.
LikeLike
missbee12
August 27, 2010
I’m a voracious reader and I have the Sony E-Reader. I’ve had it going on over 4 years now. This past Christmas I updated to a new version but the very first version still works perfectly (that’s for those who find it “flimsy”. I tend to find things are as flimsy as one treats them.) I love it. I still get the majority of my books from the library because I love reading actual books. But for travel or trains or anywhere that I don’t want to lug a several hundred page book along its fantastic.
Also with the Sony you can get digital books out of the library for a week to 2 weeks and not even have to pay for them. I use mine for the same reasons you believe you would use yours- convenience, portability, instant gratification, speed. Can’t be beat.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 27, 2010
Thank you for that report. I hope to model your flexibility, because like you, I can’t give up the traditional books, but I do think I’d love that little magic gizmo, too.
LikeLike
subcorpus
September 3, 2010
After doing some research about price, screen size and PDF support, I ended up buying the Amazon Kindle DX. And it is great. It really is a good device. It doesn’t do much, but what is does, it does beautifully. Very nice.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
September 4, 2010
You’ve added a little more confirmation to my belief that ebook readers aren’t going to replace anything; they’re an additional option. Your mention of PDF support is interesting, too. When I looked at the Sony Reader, I asked the salesperson if I could load my own PDFs onto it, thinking I might be able to proofread my own documents, even if I couldn’t edit them. That would be another selling point for me, but he didn’t know. I wonder if you could elaborate a bit.
Thanks for the comment.
LikeLike