I have been called wishy-washy, right to my face and on more than one occasion. Is it because I seem indecisive? Maybe. Inconsistent? Sometimes. Driven to look at questions from every possible angle before answering? That depends on exactly what you’re asking. When you say every, you don’t mean it literally, do you? Because that would take forever. And driven in what way? Are you suggesting I’m irrational? Obsessive? Out of control?
This tendency of mine makes the people around me crazy, and given the chance, most of them would crack me over the head with a shovel and roll me down a big hill. But I think there’s value in resisting the temptation to jump into one camp or the other on every issue. Am I liberal or conservative? Traditional or progressive? Cautious or spontaneous?
It depends.
In many ways, those two words guide my life. My son and I were in the car the other day and he asked if it’s ever okay to cross the double yellow line. I said that on a written exam, the correct answer would be No, it’s never okay. Crossing a double yellow line, I added, would almost certainly cause him to fail an actual driving test. But is driving that simple? Is anything?
Several years ago, I had to answer a series of questions on a job application. One of them was, “Is it ever acceptable to violate company policy?” This is similar to the question my son asked me, and it caused the same ambivalence. It’s that word ever. I was pretty sure I knew what the expected answer was, but to me, ever means this: “Can you imagine any circumstance in which disobeying company policy would be the right thing to do?” Any circumstance. Of course. If the building is being attacked by giant fire ants from the planet Mercury and the only way to get my co-workers out safely is by using the executive elevator, I’m going to do it, even though I’m just a level-3 shipping clerk and I’m not authorized to use the executive elevator. I know it violates company policy, but lives could be at stake. (Well, they said ever.)
Here’s the dilemma I faced. I’m filling out the application and trying to visualize the person who will be reading my response to this question. If I answer Yes, I could be turned down because I seem to have no regard for rules. If I answer No, I might be rejected because I’m inflexible, lack imagination, and can’t think on my feet in emergencies. Heads you win, tails I lose. The department manager later confided that she wanted to hire me, but the regional supervisor overruled her because I had answered Yes to that question. I wonder if questions like that are inserted into the application for the sole purpose of giving the company justification for not hiring you, regardless of how you answered.
When I go to a new doctor and have to fill out one of those medical history forms, there’s always a question that asks, “Are you pregnant?” Again, these are Yes or No questions. If I answer No, I feel I should elaborate, because the question seems to imply that I might have been pregnant in the past or that I might become pregnant in the future. Neither of those seems likely. On the other hand, all I have are those two little check boxes. I usually leave this question blank, but that bothers me too, as though I hadn’t completed the task or, worse, that I seemed unsure about the pregnancy issue.
Telephone surveys offer similar problems. I recently answered the phone and was asked to participate in a survey about home electronics. The first question was: “Do you own a cell phone?” I said, “No.” The next twelve questions were about when, where, and how often I used a cell phone. I hesitated after each question, almost apologetic at first, but growing increasingly irritated: “I don’t have a cell phone.” This seemed to puzzle the caller, who didn’t know how to record my responses. I was tempted to lie and make up answers about my fictional cell phone use, because really, that would have been quicker and less frustrating for both of us.
These surveys, by the way, are self-perpetuating. Once you agree to participate, your name goes into a database of people who are home, answer their phone, and have nothing else to do but reply to idiotic questions. We get calls at least once a week. It could be the government inquiring about smoking habits. Or the car dealership wondering how we enjoyed our most recent tire rotation. Or the power company wanting to know how often we unplug major appliances when we’re going to be away. I used to answer the phone by saying, “Hello.” Now I grab the receiver and just yell, “Somewhat concerned! Completely satisfied! Almost never!”
Personality tests are still another source of trouble. They present scenarios that assume to cover all of the possibilities. For example: “When attending a party, are you more likely to mingle, making sure you talk to everyone, or do you prefer to become involved in a more meaningful conversation with one person?” It seems to me there should be an initial question that asks, “Do you ever get invited to parties?” This, one would think, could eliminate the need for the rest of the questions. I don’t get invited to parties. Maybe I should get a cell phone.
Here’s a little twist: Every once in a while, I’ll hear an open-ended question as though it were Yes or No. When I go out for breakfast, the waitress asks, “How would you like your eggs cooked?” My first thought is, yes, I would very much like them cooked. Who wouldn’t?
But mostly, I struggle with the questions that want a single word answer. “What’s your favorite color?” Well, if we’re talking about lettuce, my favorite color is green. If it’s chocolate, I prefer brown. I never eat green chocolate or brown lettuce. Regarding white or blue, I like white clouds and a blue sky. Reverse them and that’s some kind of environmental disaster. I like red strawberries, yellow bananas, and purple grape juice. I love rich, dark soil, the blacker the better. But when snow turns black, I get a little depressed. What’s my favorite color? It depends.
And speaking of colors, what about the double yellow line? I told my son to give the answer that follows the rules. But then I felt compelled to add that every moment he spends behind the wheel, he should see the line as something intended to protect lives. It would make no sense to cause injury or death out of deference to two stripes of paint. “If it’s a choice between crossing the line and hitting a child who’s running out into the road, cross the line.”
In our rush to lock in the correct answer, there’s limited time for such consideration. Hesitation, a willingness to debate, or any attempt at recognizing other points of view are all seen as signs of weakness, of flawed character. Critics call it relativism, a label that so terrifies politicians, they would rather be thought of as people who have stopped learning. But it’s how I try to approach most of life’s questions and choices. I feel more prepared and more confident when I’m not restricted by Yes-No, True-False, what I didn’t know five years ago, or how I felt about something last week.
It’s the advantage of being wishy-washy.
Julia Harris
July 23, 2010
This might be one of my favorite posts of yours, but it depends on what you write tomorrow or next week. If you get a cell phone, would that make you more likely to be invited to parties? Is it ALWAYS wrong to end a sentence in a preposition? I wonder if there are any questions that can be safely answered with a definitive. Sometimes being a binary thinker can be a blessing, if only because it limits the anguish one can suffer when encountered with questions with no easy answer.
But then, is any answer easy? It probably depends.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
July 23, 2010
I’m not sure about the cell phone-party connection. Actually, I don’t even like parties.
I don’t think ending a sentence with a preposition is always wrong. I wouldn’t do it on a test of standard written English, but other than that, I don’t have a problem with it. There are probably questions with easy answers, but I’m sure I’d over-complicate them anyway.
LikeLike
cooperstownersincanada
July 23, 2010
We share the some sort of analytical mind. A great piece of writing.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
July 23, 2010
Thanks, Kevin. I’m not sure sharing the same sort of mind with me is anything to be happy about, but I appreciate the nice words.
LikeLike
Betty Londergan
July 25, 2010
You are hilarious … as well as being very insightful about this issue. Do you think it’s something about writers that we hate being pinned down to one answer when it counts out so many other possibilities??
I have found myself completely unable to take “personality” tests because of this very reason — and because of the intractable nature of the boxes they’re obviously trying to shove you into. Are there really only two alternatives to party behavior — hugging the wall waiting for people to talk to you, or walking in like you own the place?? hello??? btw, i’m in shock and awe that you don’t have a cell phone…way to hold out, dude!!! (AND you sound like a pretty great dad!)
LikeLike
bronxboy55
July 25, 2010
I think you nailed it exactly: the need to put everything and everyone into boxes. I’m also sure this is how polls and statistics are manipulated to produce one result or the other; sometimes it’s the way the questions are asked.
I may give in and get a cell phone someday. Who knows? But I’m betting that by then, everyone else will have gotten the telepathy chip implanted into their skulls, and they’ll be stunned by the primitive looking electronic device I’m holding up to my ear.
Thanks for the kind words.
LikeLike
Marie M
July 25, 2010
Loved this one. It fits you perfectly. And it’s a great argument for resisting the ever-increasing binary world being created around us.
Taken to its logical limit, an overwhelming focus on the extremes leads to a dearth of individuality, personality, imagination, creativity. I don’t believe the human spirit can survive for long with those limitations. So one way or another (note that I didn’t say “the other”), I’m pretty sure an all-encompassing system of binary choices would not last very long.
Sometimes an either/or approach is genuinely helpful, but it can’t possibly be the best approach for every/most/many situations. Even soft ice cream places, with a choice of vanilla or chocolate, realized that many of us prefer a swirl of both.
PS: Could you be hearing punctuation that isn’t intended to be there when you perceive an open-ended question to be a yes/no query? Did the waitress say “How would you like your eggs, cooked?” Gotta be careful with those commas–they can change everything. Or most things, anyway.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
July 26, 2010
I was listening to a motivational speaker on CD a few months ago, and he said this: “There are NO gray areas.” He repeated it several times. I listened to the rest of the CDs all the way through, but with a much more skeptical ear. His point, I suppose, was that if you want to get things done and reach your goals, you can’t stop to deliberate every facet of every issue. But no gray areas? I would need a lobotomy to believe that. (And then I’d have to fill out another one of those medical history forms. Here we go again.)
The waitress’s question is similar to this one: “How would you like to go to the Accordion Festival with me?” Is she asking if I want to go? Or which mode of transportation I’d prefer? I think the next time I’m out for breakfast, I’m going to ask the waitress to write down her question, and then I’ll just look to see where she puts the comma. (When ordering food, at least, there should be NO gray areas.)
LikeLike
Julia Harris
July 26, 2010
No one wants gray areas in their food. Particularly if those gray areas are actually gray hairs.
LikeLike
Amiable Amiable
July 26, 2010
Is this post hilarious? YES! Can I wait for your next one? NO!
LikeLike
bronxboy55
July 26, 2010
You’re too kind, AA. I can’t wait to read your post about that amazing wedding you attended in NYC:
http://bighappynothing.wordpress.com/2010/07/26/my-big-happy-50-60k-nyc-birthday-celebration/
LikeLike
heidit
August 5, 2010
Holy Hannah, I completely relate to this article! Well-written, humourous and absolutely accurate. I am a decent writer and a fairly intelligent person. In university, I could write an essay on virtually any topic and come away with pretty good grades. But give me a multiple choice test and nine times out of ten I could talk myself out of the correct answer. Why? Because I could see instances in which a different option would make sense.
The worst was in high school, where we had a safety exam before we were allowed to go into the woodworking room and work with the dangerous tools. The exam annoyed me to no end. One question sticks out in my mind: You should always wear your shoes when running in the woodworking room. True or False? Of course you should always wear your shoes in the woodworking room, that’s a given (unless your shoes are flip-flops, which opens a whole other can of worms). But answering true seemed to me to indicate that running in the room was acceptable, which it wasn’t. Unless, of course, there was an emergency, but no emergency was indicated on the test. On the other hand, NOT wearing your shoes opens you up to injury and slipping.
My final conclusion (that I’ve come to years later) is that I am just far too intelligent for such tests and questions. This is the conclusion I’m sticking to, regardless of what others may say.
And I agree with your thoughts about the word “ever”. There is always a conceivable situation in which options given would result in a person violating ethics, breaking the rules or ignoring company policy. Just because they’re not smart enough to think of fire ants from planet Mercury doesn’t mean you should suffer. Clearly you’re too smart for these tests, too.
I always wished there was a spot to justify some of the answers to these tests/quizzes/exams but then I’d probably just go on too long anyhow. Kind of like I have here.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 5, 2010
As you suggested in your last paragraph, those tests should have a separate version for people like us who think too much. Then we’d have the chance to explain our side of things, especially why yes-or-no just isn’t good enough. That question about running in the woodworking room is a perfect example; the way it’s worded, there’s no correct answer.
LikeLike
Margaret Reyes Dempsey
February 26, 2011
Ah, yes, I know all about living in the grey zone. When I watch courtroom dramas on TV and the person on the stand has to answer yes or no to questions, I break out in hives.
It’s a shame there isn’t an “It depends” response on applications. Companies would get to know a lot more about applicants if they were interested in why it depends.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
March 1, 2011
I always imagine myself testifying during a trial and the judge gives me that, “Will the witness please answer the question?” And I stand up and say, “I’m sorry. Are you looking for one word answers? I thought we were here trying to serve JUSTICE!” And then the next scene is me being led away in handcuffs and thrown in jail for contempt of court. (Hey, this is starting to sound familiar.)
LikeLike
Bruce
August 10, 2014
Charles, if I say I relate to some or many of the things you’ve said, does that mean I’m wishy-washy too? If so then I’m in good company. In particular, I like the pregnancy question and answering the phone…… finishing with almost never! A good laugh. Please think of the initial question as rhetoric; therefore no answer required.
LikeLike
bronxboy55
August 10, 2014
How did you ever end up back on this very old post? I’d forgotten about it.
(No need to answer my question either.)
LikeLike
Bruce
August 10, 2014
I’m not sure how that happened Charles. I think I followed an arrow at the bottom of a post I had finished reading. I only noticed the date when I went to comment. It might be old but it’s still good.
LikeLike